واکاوی نقش انعطافپذیری شناختی حسابرسان در بهبود وظیفهگرایی اخلاقی در حرفه حسابرسی
کلمات کلیدی:
انعطافپذیری شناختی, سازههای شناختی, چارچوبهای ذهنی, الزامات شناختی, وظیفه گرایی اخلاقیچکیده
هدف این پژوهش تبیین چارچوب انعطافپذیری شناختی حسابرسان و بررسی تأثیر آن بر وظیفهگرایی اخلاقی در حرفه حسابرسی است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف توسعهای–کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت، ترکیبی (کیفی–کمی) است. در بخش کیفی، با استفاده از تحلیل مضمون و انجام ۱۴ مصاحبه عمیق با خبرگان حسابرسی، مؤلفههای انعطافپذیری شناختی استخراج شد و پایایی آنها با تحلیل دلفی تأیید گردید. در بخش کمی، دادهها از طریق پرسشنامه محققساخته انعطافپذیری شناختی و پرسشنامه استاندارد وظیفهگرایی اخلاقی از ۳۹۵ حسابرس گردآوری و با مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی تحلیل شد. نتایج بخش کیفی منجر به شناسایی ۳ مضمون فراگیر، ۸ مضمون سازماندهنده و ۴۸ مضمون پایه گردید. یافتههای استنباطی بخش کمی نشان داد انعطافپذیری شناختی حسابرسان اثر مثبت و معناداری بر وظیفهگرایی اخلاقی آنان دارد (ضریب مسیر مثبت و معنادار در سطح اطمینان ۹۵ درصد). یافتهها نشان میدهد انعطافپذیری شناختی بهعنوان یک قابلیت محوری، نقش تعیینکنندهای در تقویت تصمیمگیری اخلاقی و پایبندی حسابرسان به تکالیف اخلاقی ایفا میکند و میتواند به ارتقای کیفیت حرفهای و اعتماد عمومی به حرفه حسابرسی منجر شود.
دانلودها
مراجع
Akbar, R., & Kuntadi, C. (2024). Pengaruh independensi auditor, profesionalisme auditor dan etika profesi auditor terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 2(5), 36-52.
Birney, D. P., & Beckmann, J. F. (2022). Intelligence IS cognitive flexibility: Why multilevel models of within-individual processes are needed to realise this. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030049
Castka, P., Zhao, X., Bremer, P., Wood, L. C., & Mirosa, M. (2021). Supplier audits during COVID-19: A process perspective on their transformation and implications for the future. The International Journal of Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-05-2021-0302
Chen, Y., Li, S., Xia, Q., & He, C. (2017). The relationship between job demands and employees' counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effect of psychological detachment and job anxiety. Frontiers in psychology, 8(4), 1890-1898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01890
Chen, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and its impact on decision-making quality in auditing: An empirical study. International Journal of Auditing, 24(3), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12189
Chen, Y. H., Wang, K. J., & Liu, S. H. (2023). How personality traits and professional skepticism affect auditor quality? A quantitative model. Sustainability, 15(7), 74-93. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021547
Curtis, B., Hefley, B., & Miller, S. (2018). People Capability Maturity Model (PCMM) Version 2.0 (2nd ed.). Carnegie Mellon University.
Garcia, M., & Martinez, L. (2021). Metacognitive beliefs and ethical behavior in auditors: An experimental study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106789
Hauptman, M., Liu, Y. F., & Bedny, M. (2024). Built to adapt: Mechanisms of cognitive flexibility in the human brain. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 6, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120621-042108
Heidari, Q., Nikoomaram, H., & Vakilifard, H. R. (2023). The relationship between dark personality traits and the tendency toward fraudulent behavior: A test of social trust theory. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 10(1), 12-27.
Hendar, F., & Harahap, D. (2023). The influence of time budget pressure, auditor experience, and auditor competence on audit judgment. Kajian Akuntansi, 24(8), 374-387. https://doi.org/10.29313/kajian_akuntansi.v24i2.2671
Highgate, Q., & Schenk, S. (2021). Cognitive flexibility in humans and other laboratory animals. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 51(1), 97-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2020.1784240
Johnson, R., & Lee, K. (2020). The impact of metacognitive skills on professional judgment in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52418
Karimi, Z., Yaghoob-Nezhad, A., Samadi-Largani, M., & Pourali-Laklayeh, M. R. (2021). Evaluating the impact of individual psychological biases and personality dimensions of auditors on audit quality. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 13(52), 23-52.
Kohandel, Z., Doaei, M., & Zamanianfar, L. (2025). The Effectiveness of Cognitive Biases on Audit Errors Based on Structural Equation Modeling. Investment Knowledge, 14(56), 507-526.
Krishnan, G., & Pevzner, M. (2018). The influence of metacognitive beliefs on auditors' professional skepticism. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(5), 1245-1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12223
Kun, A., & Gadanecz, P. (2022). Workplace happiness, well-being and their relationship with psychological capital: A study of Hungarian teachers. Current Psychology, 41(1), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00550-0
Kupis, L. B., & Uddin, L. Q. (2023). Developmental neuroimaging of cognitive flexibility: update and future directions. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120221-035310
Lin, C. E. (2021). Cognitive Flexibility. In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (pp. 1048-1049). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91280-6_1991
Martins, J. T., & Gonçalves, J. (2022). Cognitive flexibility and the work context: Integrative literature review. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 24(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5935/1980-6906/ePTPSP14027.en
McCarthy, S. (2018). Financial Management Maturity Model: A Good Practice Guide.
Mohamed, E. K., & Lashine, S. H. (2022). Metacognitive beliefs and professional judgment in auditing: The mediating role of ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04972-4
Moustafa Abdallah, B. A., Ghanem, M. G., & Hijazi, W. H. (2024). Analyzing the factors that affect auditor's judgment and decision making in Lebanese audit firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(2), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17020073
Munidewi, I. A. B., Ludigdo, U., Djamhuri, A., & Andayani, W. (2024). Role of affective neuroscience in audit judgement and decision making: A systematic literature review for auditing research. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(1), 130-147. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v18i1.08
Muterera, J., & Brettle, J. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of auditor well-being on audit quality. International journal of management, accounting & economics, 11(3).
Nemati-Keshteli, R., Hamidian, M., Jafari, S. M., & Sarraf, M. (2020). The impact of auditors' cognitive styles on fraud risk assessment (A test of Grigork's Energetic Theory). Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 5(9), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.5.9.33
Ponomareva, Y., Uman, T., Broberg, P., Vinberg, E., & Karlsson, K. (2020). Commercialization of audit firms and auditors' subjective well-being. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(4), 565-585. https://doi.org/1108/MEDAR-10-2018-0384
Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271
Russell, J. E. A. (2008). Promoting subjective well-being at work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707308142
Saputra, B., Solihatin, E., & Muslim, S. (2022). Cognitive flexibility abilities in learning: A systematic review of the literature. Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.53402/ajet.v2i2.373
Steinke, A., & Kopp, B. (2020). Toward a computational neuropsychology of cognitive flexibility. Brain Sciences, 10(12), 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10121000
Summers, E. M., Morris, R. C., Bhutani, G. E., Rao, A. S., & Clarke, J. C. (2021). A survey of psychological practitioner workplace well-being. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(2), 438-451. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2509
Svanberg, J., & Öhman, P. (2016). Auditors' time pressure: Does ethical culture support audit quality? Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(7), 572-591. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2015-1215
Taylor, S., Anderson, R., & White, L. (2021). Metacognitive beliefs and auditors' professional performance: The moderating role of ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04872-7
Tomassi, N. E., Turashvili, D., Williams, A., Walsh, B., Stephen, E. P., & Stepp, C. E. (2025). Investigating Cognitive Load and Autonomic Arousal During Voice Production and Vocal Auditory-Motor Adaptation. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 68(4), 1634-1653. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00601
Tuan Mansor, T. M., Mohamad Ariff, A., Hashim, H. A., & Ngah, A. H. (2021). External whistleblowing intentions of auditors: A perspective based on stimulus-organism-response theory. Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2021-0116
Vaz, C. R., Selig, P. M., & Viegas, C. V. (2018). A proposal of intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) evaluation. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0130
Walwanis, M. M., & Ponto, S. J. (2019). Clarifying cognitive flexibility from a self-regulatory perspective. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 631-643). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22419-6_45
Wilson, T., Brown, A., & Davis, R. (2020). The impact of metacognitive training on improving auditors' professional judgment. Accounting Horizons, 34(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52647
Yazdani Far, N., Moradi, M. A., & Faghani, M. (2025). Investigating the Impact of Investor Accounting Cognition on Debt Maturity and Asset Growth Opportunities of Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting and Management Auditing Knowledge, 14(54), 287-312.
Zolfi, S., & Yazdanian, N. (2023). Auditors' dark personality traits and their impact on fraud risk assessment. Accounting and Auditing Research, 15(57), 179-206.
دانلودها
چاپ شده
ارسال
بازنگری
پذیرش
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
حق نشر 2025 Moslem Khoon Siavashan (Author); Javad Ramezani (Corresponding author); Mehdi Khalilpour, Ali Fallah (Author)

این پروژه تحت مجوز بین المللی Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 می باشد.