Evaluating the Approach of Active and Passive Investors in Detecting Ponzi Patterns for Capital Market Financial Decision-Making

Authors

    Ahmad Tavakoli Department of Financial Management, MaS.C., Islamic Azad University, Masjed Soliman, Iran
    Allah Karam Salehi * Department of Financial Management, MaS.C., Islamic Azad University, Masjed-Soleiman, Iran AK.salehi@iau.ac.ir
    Alireza Aghabeiki Alughareh Department of Industrial Management, MaS.C., Islamic Azad University, Masjed Soliman, Iran
    Shahrokh Bozorgmehrian Department of Accounting, MaS.C., Islamic Azad University, Masjed Soliman, Iran

Keywords:

Active investors, passive investors, Ponzi pattern detection

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between active and passive investors in detecting Ponzi patterns and to determine the reliability of their approaches in capital market financial decision-making. This semi-experimental and ex post facto study was conducted using data from 103 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over the period 2019–2024, resulting in 515 firm-year observations. A composite Ponzi detection index was developed based on five indicators, including financial risk identification, financial sensitivity, financial crisis, bankruptcy risk, and key performance indicators. Data analysis was performed using leptokurtic distribution modeling, quantile regression, nonlinear GARCH modeling, and artificial neural network analysis. Additionally, to distinguish between investor types, the Markowitz portfolio model was used to represent active investors, and the Sortino portfolio model was used to represent passive investors. Model evaluation criteria included the coefficient of determination, mean squared error, and mean absolute error. Inferential analysis revealed that the financial risk identification index had the highest predictive power in detecting Ponzi patterns among the evaluated indicators. Quantile regression results confirmed that the proposed composite index significantly explained Ponzi-related financial risk compared to the overall market index. Furthermore, comparative analysis of portfolios showed that the Markowitz portfolio had a significantly higher coefficient of determination and predictive reliability than the Sortino portfolio, indicating superior effectiveness of active investors in identifying and managing Ponzi-related risks. The findings confirmed a statistically significant difference between active and passive investor approaches in detecting Ponzi patterns. The results demonstrated that active investors have greater capability than passive investors in detecting Ponzi patterns and evaluating associated financial risks, and the use of financial risk-based analytical models can significantly improve financial decision-making quality and enhance capital market efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almansour, B. Y., Elkrghli, S., & Almansour, A. Y. (2023). Behavioral finance factors and investment decisions: A mediating role of risk perception. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2239032

Amoah, B. (2018). Mr Ponzi with Fraud Scheme Is Knocking: Investors Who May Open. Global Business Review, 19(5), 220-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918788625

Badieinejad, A., & Tavangar, A. (2022). The effect of passive institutional ownership concentration, CEO tenure, and product market competition on the relationship between passive institutional investor distraction and corporate information opacity. Journal of Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 14(54), 233-262.

Baltacı, A., & Vural, A. (2024). Anatomy of herd behavior in Ponzi schemes within the scope of marketing mix. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-09-2023-0218

Berezinets, I., & Ilina, Y. (2022). Investor activism strategies of private equity firms: evidence from continental Europe. Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-06-2019-0225

Bhadra, S., & Singh, K. N. (2024). Ponzi scheme like investment schemes in India, causes, impact and solution. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 27(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-02-2023-0040

Eisenberg, D. T., & Quesenberry, N. W. (2014). Ponzi Schemes in Bankruptcy. Touro Law Review, 30(3), 38-55. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol30/iss3/3

Gopane, T. J., Moyo, N. T., & Setaka, L. F. (2024). Emerging market analysis of passive and active investing under bear and bull market conditions. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 8(1), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-03-2023-0008

Gui, Z., Huang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2024). Financial fraud and investor awareness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 219(4), 104-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.01.006

Haryadi, B., Wahyudi, I., & Hayati, N. (2022). Uncovering the Dark Side of Ponzi Schemes Through Money Game. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 17(2), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2022.v17.i02.p02

Hasan, S. A., Piri, P., & Chalaki, P. (2026). Designing an optimal decision-making model for investors: Integrating artificial intelligence and financial reporting transparency. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 14(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22108/amf.2025.143308.1934

Heidari, Z., & Mashayekh, S. (2025). The Consequences of Disclosing Key Audit Matters on Investor Judgment and Decision-Making. Empirical Accounting Research, 15(1), 53-84.

Hofstetter, M., Mejía, D., Rosas, J. N., & Urrutia, M. (2018). Ponzi schemes and the financial sector: DMG and DRFE in Colombia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 96(2), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.08.011

Jafari, Z., Banabi Ghadim, R., & Abdi, R. (2024). Evaluating the sinusoidal fluctuations of emotional and intuitive orientations of active investors in the formation of herding decision-making in the capital market. Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 15(60), 41-64.

Jagirdar, S. S., & Gupta, P. K. (2024). Charting the financial odyssey: a literature review on history and evolution of investment strategies in the stock market (1900-2022). China Accounting and Finance Review, 26(3), 277-307. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAFR-10-2023-0124

Jamshidi, N., & Fadaeinejad, M. E. (2019). Investigating the performance of active and passive individual investors in the Tehran Stock Exchange using portfolio study and self-benchmark abnormal return approaches. Asset Management and Financing, 7(2), 25-40.

Jethro Godi, N. (2024). Analysis of Risk Factors for Investors in Emerging Markets. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 14(2), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.469

Kazemi Foroushani, H., & Ghadir, M. (2020). Theoretical imperatives of fraud against the law from the perspective of Iranian law. Journal of Private and Criminal Law Research, 16(3), 67-85.

Khan, M. T. I., Tan, S. H., & Chong, L. L. (2017). Active trading and retail investors in Malaysia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(4), 708-726. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-03-2016-0063

Nayeb Mohseni, S., Khalifeh Soltani, S. A., & Hejazi, R. (2021). Developing a behavioral model of individual investors' decision-making in the Iranian capital market. Financial Research, 23(4), 625-652.

Panwar, M., Verma, M., Ray, B., Vashishtha, A., Mittal, S., & Rathnasiri, M. S. H. (2025). Investor Perception and Transforming Decision-Making in the Age of AI-Driven Work Arrangements. 495-528. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1270-5.ch026

Scheld, D., & Stolper, O. (2023). Leveling the playing field? The effect of disclosing fund manager activeness to individual investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 106915.

Shafakheyberi, N., Hirad, A., Abdoli, M., & Sotoudeh, R. (2025). Ontology of the Ponzi nature in the emergence of opportunistic accounting procedures: Presenting a paradigmatic phenomenological model. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 22(88), 219-325.

Singh, K. N., & Misra, G. (2023). Victimisation of investors from fraudulent investment schemes and their protection through financial education. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(5), 1305-1322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2022-0167

Suwitho, S., Riharjo, I. B., & Dewangga, D. A. (2023). The nexus between Ponzi scheme and multi-level marketing systems: Evidence in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2178540

Ullah, I., Ahmad, W., & Ali, A. (2022). Determinants of investment decision in a Ponzi scheme: Investors' perspective on the Modaraba scam. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1172-1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2020-0027

Uppiah, V. (2018). A critical examination of the regulation of Ponzi scheme in Mauritius. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(6), 1393-1400. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2017-0201

Downloads

Published

1405-10-01

Submitted

1404-07-01

Revised

1404-11-24

Accepted

1404-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tavakoli, A. ., Salehi, A. K., Aghabeiki Alughareh, A. ., & Bozorgmehrian, S. . (1405). Evaluating the Approach of Active and Passive Investors in Detecting Ponzi Patterns for Capital Market Financial Decision-Making. Accounting, Finance and Computational Intelligence, 1-23. https://www.jafci.com/index.php/jafci/article/view/363

Similar Articles

1-10 of 38

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.