Digital Transformation and Accounting Information Quality: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty
Keywords:
Digital transformation, Accounting information quality, Environmental uncertainty, Panel data, Tehran Stock ExchangeAbstract
This study aimed to explain the moderating role of environmental uncertainty in the relationship between digital transformation and accounting information quality among firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. This applied study employed a descriptive-correlational and ex post facto research design based on panel data. The statistical population consisted of all firms active on the Tehran Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2024. After applying systematic elimination criteria, 106 firms were selected as the final sample. Accounting information quality was measured through discretionary accruals using the Jones model. Digital transformation was operationalized as a dummy variable indicating whether the firm had invested in technology and digitalization, and environmental uncertainty was measured based on sales fluctuations. The research hypotheses were tested using multivariate regression analysis with panel data and fixed-effects estimation in EViews 8. The first regression model was statistically significant, with an F-statistic of 14.536 and a significance level of 0.000. The coefficient of determination and adjusted coefficient of determination were 0.425 and 0.421, respectively. Digital transformation had a positive and statistically significant effect on accounting information quality, as indicated by a coefficient of 0.596, a t-statistic of 3.857, and a significance level of 0.001. The second regression model was also statistically significant, with an F-statistic of 15.251 and a significance level of 0.001. The adjusted coefficient of determination was 0.382. The interaction effect between digital transformation and environmental uncertainty was positive and statistically significant, with a coefficient of 0.251, a t-statistic of 2.221, and a significance level of 0.034. The findings indicate that digital transformation enhances accounting information quality by improving transparency, reducing information asymmetry, and limiting opportunistic managerial behavior. Environmental uncertainty also significantly moderates this relationship, highlighting the importance of digital technologies for maintaining accounting information quality under unstable business conditions.
Downloads
References
Al-Okaily, M. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of accounting information systems in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(1), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0148
Ansong, E., & Boateng, R. (2019). Surviving in the digital era-business models of digital enterprises in a developing economy. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(2), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-08-2018-0046
Bin-Feng, C., Mirza, S. S., Ahsan, T., & Qureshi, M. A. (2024). How uncertainty can determine corporate ESG performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2290-2310. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2695
Chang, I. C., Liu, C. C., & Wu, T. L. (2021). Does cloud computing influence enterprise performance? Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 33(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.295979
Chen, H. S., Lin, Y. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2024). Reexamining information asymmetry related to corporate spin-offs. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 94, 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.01.011
Chen, L., Tu, R., Huang, B., Zhou, H., & Wu, Y. (2024). Digital transformation's impact on innovation in private enterprises: Evidence from China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(2), 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100491
Ding, X., Sheng, Z., Appolloni, A., Shahzad, M., & Han, S. (2024). Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3718
Fang, B., Liu, X., Ma, C., & Zhuo, Y. (2023). Blockchain technology adoption and accounting information quality. Accounting and Finance, 63(4), 4125-4156. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13088
Feng, T., Dong, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). Assessing the impact of digital transformation on capital market information efficiency under environmental uncertainty: Evidence from China. PLoS One, 19(1), e0295187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295187
Gaba, V., & Joseph, J. (2013). Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in M-form firms. Organization Science, 24(4), 1102-1119. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0788
Gao, C., Zuzul, T., Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2017). Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation-based view of long-run survival. Strategic management journal, 38(11), 2147-2167. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2649
Garanina, T., Ranta, M., & Dumay, J. (2022). Blockchain in accounting research: Current trends and emerging topics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(7), 1507-1533. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4991
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2018). Time varying risk aversion. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(3), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.007
Gul, F. A., Kim, J. B., & Qiu, A. A. (2010). Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.005
Han, J., Zhang, W., Isik, C., Zhao, W., Anas, M., Zheng, Q., Xie, D., & Bakhsh, S. (2024). Sustainable development pathways: Exploring the impact of green finance on urban metabolic efficiency. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3081
Huang, H., Mbanyele, W., Zhang, L., Chen, X. L., & Song, M. (2025). Nonnegligible transition risks towards net-zero economy: Lessons from green finance initiatives in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 375, 124132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124132
Huy, P. Q., Phuc, V. K., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). The impact of public sector scorecard adoption on the effectiveness of accounting information systems towards the sustainable performance in public sector. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1717718
Jabbar, A., Akhtar, P., & Dani, S. (2020). Real-time big data processing for instantaneous marketing decisions: A problematization approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.001
Klos, C., Spieth, P., Clauss, T., & Klusmann, C. (2021). Digital transformation of incumbent firms: A business model innovation perspective. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(6), 2017-2033. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3075502
Li, K., Xia, B., Chen, Y., Ding, N., & Wang, J. (2021). Environmental uncertainty, financing constraints and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 70, 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101665
Li, S., Gao, L., Han, C., Gupta, B., Alhalabi, W., & Almakdi, S. (2023). Exploring the effect of digital transformation on firms' innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100317
Li, Z., Miao, S., & Xu, L. (2024). Digital transformation and environmental, social, and governance greenwashing: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121460
Liao, Z., Chen, J., Chen, X., & Song, M. (2024). Digital platform capability, environmental innovation quality, and firms' competitive advantage: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 268, 109124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109124
Liebman, B. H., & Reynolds, K. M. (2019). Competitive pressure, innovation and trade protection: Evidence from US patent data. The World Economy, 42(6), 1695-1712. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12765
Liu, D., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2024). Comparable but is it informative? Accounting information comparability and price synchronicity. Journal of Financial Stability, 73, 101297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101297
Liu, Y., Huang, H., Mbanyele, W., Wei, Z., & Li, X. (2025). How does green industrial policy affect corporate green innovation? Evidence from the green factory identification in China. Energy Economics, 141, 108047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108047
Mbanyele, W., Huang, H., Muchenje, L. T., & Zhao, J. (2024). How does climate regulatory risk influence labor employment decisions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. China Economic Review, 87, 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102236
Nguyen, B., & Vu, N. (2024). Does intrinsic motivation or extrinsic pressure matter more? An exploratory study of small businesses going green and innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3676
Ozili, P. K. (2021). Financial reporting under economic policy uncertainty. Journal of Financial Reporting & Accounting, 19(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2020-0242
Peng, H. U. O., & Luxin, W. A. N. G. (2022). Digital economy and business investment efficiency: Inhibiting or facilitating? Research in International Business and Finance, 63, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101797
Peress, J. (2010). Product market competition, insider trading, and stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 65(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01522.x
Pino, A. F. S., Ruiz, P. H., Mon, A., & Collazos, C. A. (2024). Mechanisms for measuring technology maturity on the internet of things in enterprises: A systematic literature mapping. Internet of Things, 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101100
Qiu, J., Deng, X., & Liang, R. (2024). Can the enterprise intelligent transformation promote accounting information transparency? Pressure from media attention. Finance Research Letters, 66, 105605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105605
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 mehdi Maranjori (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
