Explaining the Mechanisms Through Which XBRL-Based Digital Financial Reporting Affects Accounting Information Quality: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework

Authors

    Hajar Moazami Nejad Department of Accounting, Marv.C., Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
    Zahra Aghashiri * Department of Management and Accounting, National University of Skills, Tehran, Iran Zahra_aghashiri@yahoo.com

Keywords:

 Digital financial reporting, XBRL, Accounting information quality, Information transparency, Data-based theory

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the mechanisms through which XBRL-based digital financial reporting affects accounting information quality and to develop an integrated conceptual framework. This study was conducted as a systematic review based on the PRISMA 2020 guideline. The research population included studies published in reputable international databases on digital financial reporting, XBRL, accounting information quality, transparency, comparability, disclosure quality, and financial reporting quality. Searches were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Emerald, SpringerLink, and Wiley Online Library. After identification, duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, full-text assessment, and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 eligible articles were included in the final analysis. Extracted data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory approach through open, axial, and selective coding. The analytical findings indicated that XBRL-based digital financial reporting affects accounting information quality through data standardization, financial information structuring, improved processability, enhanced comparability, increased information transparency, and stronger interoperability among reporting systems. The three-stage coding process resulted in 123 final concepts and 31 main categories, which were organized within a paradigmatic model consisting of causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, the central phenomenon, strategies, and consequences. The central phenomenon was identified as “standardization and intelligentization of financial information within XBRL-based digital financial reporting.” The results show that XBRL is not merely a technological tool for financial disclosure, but a transformative infrastructure for improving accounting information quality. Its full effectiveness depends on organizational digital maturity, institutional coordination, standardized reporting infrastructures, user acceptance, and strengthened digital monitoring. Accordingly, XBRL can improve financial transparency, comparability, decision usefulness, investor trust, and the efficiency of financial reporting and oversight systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acca. (2025). Qualitative accounting characteristics. ACCA Global. https://www.accaglobal.com/

Al Okaily, M., Alkayed, H., & Al Okaily, A. (2024). Does XBRL adoption increase financial information transparency in digital disclosure environment? Insights from emerging markets. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1), 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100228

Alsharayri, M. A., & Al Arabiat, M. A. (2021). The expected impact of using extensible business reporting language on financial information quality in Jordanian banks. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(5), 1-11.

Alzeer, M., Ramakrishnan, S., & Hashim, H. I. C. (2026). Reimagining financial reporting: The XBRL evolution through systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v16-i3/27838

Birt, J., Birt, P., & Muthusamy, K. (2019). XBRL and the qualitative characteristics of useful financial information. Accounting Research Journal, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2014-0105

Bonson, E., Cortijo, V., & Escobar, T. (2009). Towards the global adoption of XBRL using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.10.002

Drago, C., Graziano, E. A., Petrocione, G., & Moravec, T. (2026). Financial knowledge, innovation and the digital Euro: A survey-based study. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 17, 101059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.101059

Efendi, J., Smith, L. M., & Wong, J. (2011). Longitudinal analysis of voluntary adoption of XBRL on financial reporting. International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 2(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1440956

Escobar Rodriguez, T., & Gago Rodriguez, S. (2012). We were the first to support a major IS innovation: Research into the motivations of Spanish pioneers in XBRL. 15(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(12)70039-0

Gandhi, S. K. (2010). XBRL and financial reporting taxonomy: A revolution in preparation, communication and analysis of electronic financial reports. In A. K. Basu & M. Saha (Eds.), Contemporary Issues & Debates in Accounting (1st ed.). Pearson.

Ghani, E. K., Said, J., & Muhammad, K. (2014). Enhancing corporate governance via XBRL: Preparers' perception on compatibility expectation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.039

Hoffman, C. (2022). Essentials of XBRL-Based Digital Financial Reporting: Understanding and Using Modern Approaches to Financial Reporting When the Report Model Can Be Altered or Reshaped by Report Creators (1st ed.). https://xbrlsite.azurewebsites.net/2021/essentials/Index.html

Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U., & Morris, L. (2021). eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): A review and implications for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 40(2), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2019-517

Konys, A. (2020). How to support digital sustainability assessment? An attempt to knowledge systematization. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2297-2311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.288

Moolkham, M. (2025). Digital transformation, financial performance and firm valuation: The moderating effect of environmental risk. 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2025.100075

Nofel, M., Marzouk, M., Elbardan, H., Saleh, R., & Mogahed, A. (2024). Integrating blockchain, IoT, and XBRL in accounting information systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080372

Ogundejil, M. G., Oluwakayode, E., & Tijani, O. M. (2014). Critical factors of XBRL adoption in Nigeria: A case for semantic model-based digital financial reporting. Computer Science and Information Technology, 2, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.13189/csit.2014.020105

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Phornlaphatrachakorn, K., & Na Kalasindhu, K. (2021). Digital accounting, financial reporting quality and digital transformation: Evidence from Thai listed firms. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(8), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no8.0409

Rowbottom, N., Locke, J., & Troshani, I. (2021). When the tail wags the dog? Digitalisation and corporate reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, 101226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101226

Steve, Y., Liu, F. C., & Zhu, X. (2018). The impact of XBRL on financial statement structural comparability. In R. Lamboglia, A. Cardoni, R. P. Dameri, & D. Mancini (Eds.), Network, Smart and Open (pp. 193-206). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62636-9_13

Tarmidi, M., & Abdul Roni, R. (2014). An international comparison of the determinants and financial information quality in XBRL reporting environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.061

Tawiah, V., & Borgi, H. (2022). Impact of XBRL adoption on financial reporting quality: A global evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 35(6), 815-833.

Yang, J., Ying, L., & Xu, X. (2024). Digital transformation and accounting information comparability. Finance Research Letters, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104993

Yarlagadda, V. K., Maddula, S. S., Sachani, D. K., Mullangi, K., Anumandla, S. K. R., & Patel, B. (2020). Unlocking business insights with XBRL: Leveraging digital tools for financial transparency and efficiency. Asian Accounting and Auditing Advancement, 11(1), 101-116. https://4ajournal.com/article/view/94

Yuan, X., & Wang, Y. (2009). Study on the function of XBRL and the enhancement of the accounting information quality under the background of informationization. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(11), 137-139. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n11p137

Zamzam, A., & Qaffas, A. A. (2018). XBRL technologies for financial reporting in information systems. International Journal of Management and Information Technology, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijmit.v13i0.7609

Published

2027-10-23

Submitted

2026-02-20

Revised

2026-06-22

Accepted

2026-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Moazami Nejad, H. . ., & Aghashiri, Z. . (1406). Explaining the Mechanisms Through Which XBRL-Based Digital Financial Reporting Affects Accounting Information Quality: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework. Accounting, Finance and Computational Intelligence, 1-24. https://www.jafci.com/index.php/jafci/article/view/463

Similar Articles

1-10 of 275

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.