A Meta-Model for Fraud Risk Assessment in Auditing: A Qualitative Approach Based on Grounded Theory
Keywords:
Keywords: Fraud Risk, Auditing, Audit Quality, Grounded TheoryAbstract
The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive meta-model for fraud risk assessment in auditing using a qualitative grounded theory approach based on expert perspectives. This qualitative fundamental research adopted a multidimensional grounded theory methodology. Data were collected in 2023 through semi-structured interviews with 32 experts, including university scholars, audit firm partners, regulatory authorities, and financial analysts. Participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data analysis was conducted through open, axial, and selective coding using MAXQDA software. Extracted concepts were systematically categorized into causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening factors, strategic actions, and consequences. The findings indicated that fraud risk assessment represents a dynamic and multidimensional process shaped by the interaction of individual competencies, organizational structures, and environmental conditions. Core causal factors included auditors’ proficiency in applying auditing standards and regulations, cognitive and perceptual capabilities, professional expertise, and awareness of business environment complexity. Contextual conditions involved effective institutional supervision, professional collaboration, communication and networking capabilities, and evidence-based decision-making. Intervening conditions such as professional ethics, auditor competence, performance management, social responsibility orientation, and adaptation to information technology developments strengthened the assessment process. Strategic mechanisms emphasized improving auditors’ ability to recognize emerging fraud patterns and ensuring integrated interpretation of laws and standards, ultimately enhancing professional judgment and audit effectiveness. The proposed meta-model demonstrates that effective fraud risk assessment extends beyond traditional financial indicators and requires a systemic, multi-level perspective integrating human, institutional, and technological dimensions. Implementing this framework can improve audit quality, enhance financial reporting transparency, strengthen stakeholder trust, increase financial market efficiency, and mitigate economic consequences arising from fraudulent activities.
Downloads
References
Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption: An integrative literature review approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2337893. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893
Andon, P., Free, C., Mouritsen, J., & Tanima, F. A. (2025). Ritualistic exploitation: Fraud offender perspectives on auditing and auditors. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 38(9), 402-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2024-7530
Boluo, G., Barzideh, F., & Alahyari Abhari, H. (2020). A model for assessment of the risk of fraud in an audit of financial statements. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 11(2), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22103/jak.2020.15880.3254
Borna, M., Baradaran Hasanzadeh, R., Fazlzadeh, A., & Badavar Nahandi, Y. (2021). Explaining the dimensions of the concept, examples and evidence of fraud in financial statements: Based on thematic analysis method. Value and Behavioral Accounting Quarterly, 6(12), 373-406. http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1062-fa.html
Borna, M., Baradaran Hassanzadeh, R., Fazlzadeh, A., & Badavar Nahandi, Y. (2021). Explaining the Dimensions of the Concept, Instances, and Evidence of Fraud in Financial Statements: Based on the Thematic Analysis Method. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 6(12), 373-406. https://doi.org/10.52547/aapc.6.12.373
Chui, L., Curtis, M. B., & Pike, B. J. (2022). How does an audit or a forensic perspective influence auditors' fraud-risk assessment and subsequent risk response? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(4), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-19-125
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://books.google.com/books/about/Designing_and_Conducting_Mixed_Methods_R.html?id=eTwmDwAAQBAJ
Habaza, R., Valipour, H., Salehi, H., & Avazzadeh, F. (2024). The Effect of Auditors' Internal Characteristics on Fraud Detection Ability Considering the Mediating Role of Audit Quality-Reducing Behaviors. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 9(18), 177-217. https://doi.org/10.61186/aapc.9.18.177
Habiba, R., Valipour, H., Salehi, H., & Avazadeh, F. (2024). The impact of auditors' internal characteristics on fraud detection ability considering the mediating role of audit quality reduction behaviors. Value and Behavioral Accounting Quarterly, 9(18), 177-217. http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1326-fa.html
Hashemi Dehchi, M., Izadinia, N., & Amiri, H. (2020a). The impact of financial statement comparability on the relevance of accounting information with emphasis on the role of sophisticated investors and information asymmetry. Accounting and Auditing Review, 27(3), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.22059/acctgrev.2020.303951.1008383
Hashemi Dehchi, M., Izadinia, N., & Amiri, H. (2020b). The Impact of Financial Statement Comparability on the Relevance of Accounting Information with Emphasis on the Role of Specialist Investors and Information Asymmetry. Accounting and Auditing Review, 27(3), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.22059/acctgrev.2020.303951.1008383
Islam, M. T., Habib, S. M. A., Ahmed, N., & Pandit, A. C. (2018). Corporate ethics and financial crime in banks: Bangladesh perspective. 1(1), 1-69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328737612
Jamshidi, R., Barzegar, B., & Mohseni, A. (2023a). Explaining and validating the effective factors in the model of promoting the quality of tax audit. Financial Economy, 17(64), 45-74. https://doi.org/10.30495/fed.2023.705591
Jamshidi, R., Barzegar, B., & Mohseni, A. (2023b). Explaining and Validating the Factors Affecting the Tax Audit Quality Improvement Model. Financial Economics, 17(64), 45-74. https://doi.org/10.30495/fed.2023.705591
Khalili Samarin, F., Khalilpour, M., & Ramezani, J. (2021). Ranking Internal and External Factors Affecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Financial Economics, 15(55), 231-246. https://journals.iau.ir/article_686774.html
Khalili Somarin, F., Khalilpour, M., & Ramezani, J. (2021). Ranking of internal and external factors affecting fraudulent financial reporting using a hierarchical analysis process. Financial Economy, 15(55), 231-246. https://journals.iau.ir/article_686774.html
Khalili Somarin, F., Khalilpour, M., & Ramezani, J. (2023). Factors affecting the detection of fraud in financial statements using structural equation modeling. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 14(1), 919-926. https://doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2022.27279.3546
Khoshkhalgh, A., & Talebnia, G. (2021). Explaining the Effect of Financial Reporting Concepts on the Level of Risk Disclosure in Annual Financial Reporting in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Investment Knowledge, 10(38), 455-473. http://www.jik-ifea.ir/article_17534.html
Khoshkholgh, I., & Talebnia, G. (2021). Explaining the effect of financial reporting concepts on the level of risk disclosure in annual financial reporting in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Investment Knowledge, 10(38), 455-473. http://www.jik-ifea.ir/article_17534.html
Kokogho, E., Adeniji, I. E., Olorunfemi, T. A., & Nwaozomudoh, M. O. (2023). Framework for effective risk management strategies to mitigate financial fraud in Nigeria's currency operations. International Journal of Management and Organizational Research, 2(6), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMOR.2023.2.6.209-222
Lal Bar, A., Rostami, M., & Dorajati, E. (2026). Financial statement fraud and the moderating role of the audit committee: Fuzzy AHP and Hexagon model approach. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 15(60), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmaak.2026.23979
Lalbar, A., Rostami, M., & Darjati, A. (2026). Fraud in Financial Statements and the Moderating Role of the Audit Committee: Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Hexagon Model. Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 15(60), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmaak.2026.23979
Madah Marzuki, M., Nik Abdul Majid, W. Z., Azis, N. K., Rosman, R., & Haji Abdulatif, N. K. (2020). Fraud risk management model: A content analysis approach. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n5p426
Majd, A., Chaharmahali, S., Kahandel, M., & Nourallahzadeh, N. (2024). Presenting a model for detecting financial statement fraud based on psychological components through grounded theory and meta-synthesis. Investment Knowledge, 15(57), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.30495/jik.2024.70029.4106
Majd, A., Chaharmahali, S., Kohandel, M., & Nourollahzadeh, N. (2024). Presenting a Model for Identifying Fraud in Financial Statements Based on Psychological Components Through Grounded Theory and Meta-Synthesis. Investment Knowledge, 15(57), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.30495/jik.2024.70029.4106
Marques, L. M., Cabral, P., Comfort, W. E., & Boggio, P. S. (2022). Development of morality and emotional processing. In (pp. 107-117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08651-9_7
Mirhosseini, M., Moein al-Din, M., Heirani, F., & Hataminasab, S. H. (2022). Assessing the safe behavior of accountants through the design of a professional ethics model for accountants. Occupational Health and Health Promotion, 6(2), 194-207. http://ohhp.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-331-fa.html
Mirhosseini, M., Moeinaddin, M., Heyrani, F., & Hatami Nasab, S. H. (2022). Evaluation of Safe Behavior of Accountants Through Designing an Accountant Professional Ethics Model. Occupational Health and Health Promotion, 6(2), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.18502/ohhp.v6i2.10306
Mvunabandi, J. D. (2022). How can new fraud combination theory help forensic auditors and external auditors in fraud risk assessments? Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 19(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14710/jaa.19.1.1-21
Nemati Kashteli, R., Jafari, S. M., Saraf, M., & Hamidian, M. (2020). The Impact of Auditors' Cognitive Styles on Fraud Risk Assessment (Test of Gregorc's Energetic Theory). Value and Behavioral Accounting(9), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.5.9.33
Nemati Koshteli, R., Jafari, S. M., Sarraf, M., & Hamidian, M. (2020). The impact of auditors' cognitive styles on fraud risk assessment (Testing Gregorc's energy theory). Value and Behavioral Accounting(9), 1-33. https://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-718-fa.html
Noch, M. Y. (2024). A critical analysis of risk auditing: An auditor's approach. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v4i1.383
Nosh-Azar, M., Arab, R., & Gholamrezapour, M. (2024). The joint effect of moral idealism and professional skepticism on auditor fraud detection (A case study of the Iranian National Audit Office staff). Auditing Knowledge, 24(95), 130-153. http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3139-fa.html
Noshazar, M., Arab, R., & Gholamrezapour, M. (2024). Joint Effect of Ethical Idealism and Professional Skepticism on Auditor Fraud Detection (Case Study of Supreme Audit Court Employees). Audit Science, 24(95), 130-153. http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-3139-fa.html
Pashaei Fashtali, M., Azadi Hir, K., & Vatanparast, M. (2021). Investigating the effect of Professional Ethics and Personal Moral Philosophy on Auditors' Fraud Detection Capability according to moderating role of Professional Skepticism. Accounting and Auditing Practices, 5(10), 319-349. http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-927-en.html
Rahimian, N., & Haji Heidari, R. (2019). Fraud detection using the modified Beneish model and financial ratios. Empirical Research in Accounting, 9(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2018.15993.1713
Rahimian, N., & Hajihaydari, R. (2019). Fraud Detection Using the Modified Beneish Model and Financial Ratios. Empirical Research in Accounting, 9(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2018.15993.1713
Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2016). The Fraud Triangle revisited. Security Journal, 29(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1
Shafiee, S., Mohseni, A., & Ghasemi, M. (2023). Developing an Auditor Risk-Taking Model with the Aim of Improving Auditor Professional Judgment (Multidimensional Grounded Theory Approach). Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 15(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.22108/far.2023.138702.1988
Shafiei, S., Mohseni, A., & Ghasemi, M. (2023). Developing an auditor risk-taking model with the aim of improving auditor professional judgment (Multifaceted grounded theory approach). Financial Accounting Research Journal, 15(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.22108/far.2023.138702.1988
Smith, K. T., & Smith, L. M. (2024). Examining documentation tools for audit and forensic accounting investigations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110491
Soepriyanto, G., Meiryani, M., & Modjo, M. I. (2021). Theory and factors influencing fraud in financial statements: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on E-business and Mobile Commerce, 1(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472349.3472359
Taheri, M. (2019a). Comparison of fraud triangle, diamond, and pentagon models in fraud risk assessment. Value and Behavioral Accounting, 4(8), 339-369. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.4.8.339
Taheri, M. (2019b). Comparison of Triangle, Diamond, and Pentagon Fraud Models in Fraud Risk Assessment. Value and Behavioral Accounting, 4(8), 339-369. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.4.8.339
Taheri, M., Izadinia, N., & Moayadfar, R. (2021). Comparison of Fraud Models in Audit Program Adjustment. Empirical Research in Accounting(42), 33-54. https://jera.alzahra.ac.ir/article_5873.html
Taheri, M., Izadinia, N., & Moeidfar, R. (2021). Comparison of fraud models in adjusting the audit program. Empirical Research in Accounting(42), 33-54. https://jera.alzahra.ac.ir/article_5873.html
Tajik Jalayeri, M., Ramezani, J., & Kamyabi, Y. (2022). The Impact of the International Professional Practices Framework on Internal Audit Effectiveness. Financial Accounting and Audit Research, 14(53), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.30495/faar.2022.691687
Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., Alim, M. N., Said, J., & Mohd-Sanusi, Z. (2024). Religiosity, ethical leadership and local wisdom in moderating the effect of fraud risk management on asset misappropriation: Evidence from local government in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2022-0227
Tümmler, M., & Quick, R. (2025). How to detect fraud in an audit: A systematic review of experimental literature. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00440-1
Van Driel, H. (2019). Financial fraud, scandals, and regulation: A conceptual framework and literature review. Business History, 61(8), 1259-1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2018.1519026
Younes Alazzabi, W. E., Mustafa, H., & Karage, A. I. (2023). Risk management, top management support, internal audit activities and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(2), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0147
Yuan, T., Zhang, X., & Chen, X. (2025). Machine learning based enterprise financial audit framework and high-risk identification. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.06266
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Faryad Eisazadeh (Author); Asgar Pakmaram (Corresponding author); Saeid Jabbarzadeh Kangarlouei, Jamal Bahri Sales (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
