A Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization Model with Dynamic Risk Preference and Minimum Trading Constraint under Uncertainty

Authors

    Saber Bahraminejad Department of Finance – Financial Engineering, Ab.c., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
    Farid Asgari * Department of Economics, Ab.c., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran 4410247239@iau.ac.ir
    Ali Emami Meybodi Department of Energy Economics, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
    Babak Hajikarimi Department of Industrial Management, Ab.C., Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran.

Keywords:

 Portfolio Optimization, Multi‑Period Portfolio, Dynamic Risk Preference, Value at Risk (VaR), Minimum Trading Constraint, Genetic Algorithm, Uncertainty Environment

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a multi-period portfolio optimization model under uncertainty that simultaneously incorporates dynamic investor risk preference, Value at Risk (VaR), and minimum trading constraints to improve investment decision-making and risk management over a multi-period investment horizon. This study was an applied quantitative research based on mathematical modeling and portfolio optimization. The proposed model formulated asset returns within a multi-period uncertain environment, and the objective function was designed to maximize expected wealth while controlling risk through the VaR criterion. To reflect realistic investor behavior, risk preference was modeled dynamically across different time periods. In addition, a minimum trading constraint was incorporated to reduce transaction costs and avoid unnecessary portfolio reallocations. Real monthly financial data from ten major companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2018 to 2026 were extracted from the Rahavard 365 database. Due to the nonlinear and complex structure of the optimization model, a genetic algorithm was employed as the metaheuristic solution approach in MATLAB. The model performance was evaluated using sensitivity analysis and risk–return performance indicators. The findings demonstrated that the proposed model successfully established a balance between expected return and investment risk. The optimal portfolio achieved an expected return of 0.101 with a standard deviation of 0.187, while the VaR at the 95% confidence level was estimated at −0.208. Sensitivity analysis revealed that increasing the confidence level reduced portfolio risk while slightly decreasing expected return. Moreover, higher levels of risk aversion increased the allocation toward low-risk assets and reduced portfolio volatility. The results also indicated that relaxing the trading constraint improved expected return but increased portfolio turnover and risk exposure. Furthermore, the convergence behavior of the genetic algorithm confirmed that the algorithm effectively converged toward a stable and near-optimal solution. The results indicate that the proposed multi-period portfolio optimization model, by incorporating dynamic risk preference, VaR, and minimum trading constraints, provides an efficient and realistic framework for portfolio management under uncertainty. Additionally, the use of the genetic algorithm improved solution quality and enabled the identification of optimal investment allocations over a multi-period horizon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acciaio, B., Albrecher, H., Biagini, F., & Schmidt, T. (2024). New Challenges in the Interplay Between Finance and Insurance. Oberwolfach Reports, 20(4), 2547-2635. https://doi.org/10.4171/owr/2023/44

Albaqami, H. (2025). A Monte Carlo-Based Framework for Two-Stage Stochastic Programming: Application to Bond Portfolio Optimization. Entropy, 27(11), 1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27111118

Cha, J. (2025). Inverse Portfolio Optimization With Synthetic Investor Data: Recovering Risk Preferences Under Uncertainty. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.06986

Escobar‐Anel, M., & Jiao, Y. (2024). Robust Portfolio Optimization With Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Preference. Risks, 12(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12020033

Escobar‐Anel, M., Speck, M., & Zagst, R. (2024). Bayesian Learning in an Affine GARCH Model With Application to Portfolio Optimization. Mathematics, 12(11), 1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12111611

Ghanbari, H., Tavakoli, S., Shabani, M., Mohammadi, E., Sadjadi, S. J., & Kumar, R. R. (2025). A Two-Stage Framework for Enhancing Crsyptocurrency Portfolio Performance: Integrating Credibilistic CVaR Criterion With a Novel Asset Preselection Approach. PLoS One, 20(7), e0325973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325973

Hansen, L. P., & Miao, J. (2022). Asset Pricing Under Smooth Ambiguity in Continuous Time. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4060271

Hu, Z., Rui-cheng, Y., & Borjigin, S. (2024). A Multistage Forecasting Model for Green Bond Cost Optimization With Dynamic Corporate Risk Constraints. Journal of Forecasting, 43(7), 2607-2634. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3142

Jiang, L., Wu, C., & Wang, S. (2023). Distributionally Robust Multi-Period Portfolio Selection Subject to Bankruptcy Constraints. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 19(2), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2021218

Jin, X., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2023). Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization Based on Credibilistic Lower and Upper VaR Ratios. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45(3), 4825-4845. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-224517

Kanaparthi, V. (2024). Navigating Uncertainty: Enhancing Markowitz Asset Allocation Strategies Through Out-of-Sample Analysis. Fintech, 3(1), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech3010010

Kang, J.-h., Huang, N. j., Hu, Z., & Yang, B.-Z. (2022). Robust Equilibrium Strategy for Mean-Variance-Skewness Portfolio Selection Problem. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2201.06233

Liang, G., Strub, M. S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Predictable Forward Performance Processes: Infrequent Evaluation and Applications to Human‐machine Interactions. Mathematical Finance, 33(4), 1248-1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12408

Long, J., & San-yun, Z. (2023). Optimal Portfolio Selection With Delay Under the Framework of Uncertainty Theory. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 11(10), 2848-2870. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2023.1110187

Maggistro, R., Marino, M., & Martire, A. (2024). A Dynamic Game Approach for Optimal Consumption, Investment and Life Insurance Problem. Annals of Operations Research, 346(2), 1377-1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05847-3

McKinney, R. (2026). Pricing Biodiversity Risk Under Measurement Heterogeneity: A Continuous-Time Framework for Financial Markets. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8759911/v1

Moreira, L. M., Santos, I. L. d., & González, P. H. (2025). Portfolio Optimization for Pension Purposes: Literature Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 40(1), 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12702

Mukerji, S., Özsöylev, H. N., & Tallon, J. M. (2023). Trading Ambiguity: A Tale of Two Heterogeneities. International Economic Review, 64(3), 1127-1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12627

Oliva, I., & Stefani, I. (2023). Co-Jumps and Recursive Preferences in Portfolio Choices. Annals of Finance, 19(3), 291-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-023-00425-2

Owadally, I., Jang, C., & Clare, A. (2021). Optimal Investment for a Retirement Plan With Deferred Annuities. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 98, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.02.001

Peykani, P., Nouri, M., Pishvaee, M. S., Oprean-Stan, C., & Mohammadi, E. (2023). Credibilistic Multi-Period Mean-Entropy Rolling Portfolio Optimization Problem Based on Multi-Stage Scenario Tree. Mathematics, 11(18), 3889. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183889

Pham, H., Wei, X., & Zhou, C. (2021). Portfolio Diversification and Model Uncertainty: A Robust Dynamic Mean‐variance Approach. Mathematical Finance, 32(1), 349-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12320

Polak, P., & Ulrych, U. (2021). Dynamic Currency Hedging With Ambiguity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906716

Silva, T., Valladão, D., & Homem‐de‐Mello, T. (2021). A Data-Driven Approach for a Class of Stochastic Dynamic Optimization Problems. Computational Optimization and Applications, 80(3), 687-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-021-00320-4

Wang, H., & Yu, S. M. (2021). Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment With Inverse Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.09264

Wang, L., Chen, Z., & Yang, P. (2021). Robust Equilibrium Control-Measure Policy for a DC Pension Plan With State-Dependent Risk Aversion Under Mean-Variance Criterion. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 17(3), 1203-1233. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020018

Yao, H., Chen, P., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2022). Dynamic Discrete-Time Portfolio Selection for Defined Contribution Pension Funds With Inflation Risk. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 18(1), 511. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020166

Yu, Z., Yan, C., & Wang, X. (2025). Portfolio Model Considering Normal Uncertain Preference Relations of Investors. Entropy, 27(6), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27060585

Downloads

Published

1406-04-01

Submitted

1404-12-22

Revised

1405-02-21

Accepted

1405-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bahraminejad, S., Asgari, F., Emami Meybodi, A., & Hajikarimi, B. . (1406). A Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization Model with Dynamic Risk Preference and Minimum Trading Constraint under Uncertainty. Accounting, Finance and Computational Intelligence, 1-19. https://www.jafci.com/index.php/jafci/article/view/424

Similar Articles

1-10 of 133

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)